FlightScope Mevo Gen 2 vs. Square Omni: Which Launch Monitor is Best?

Two of the most interesting launch monitors in this price range. Two completely different approaches to solving the same problem.

The FlightScope Mevo Gen 2 is my current pick for best overall launch monitor. Doppler radar, professional-level software, no subscription, and the flexibility to grow into full club data whenever you’re ready.

The Square Omni came in with more hype than almost any product I’ve ever reviewed. Four cameras, shockingly accurate indoors, no subscription. I had low expectations going in.

These two aren’t the same device. They have different strengths, different weaknesses, and a pretty different ideal buyer. So instead of trying to crown a champion, let me break down where each one wins and help you figure out which one is actually right for you.

The Quick Verdict

For most golfers, the Mevo Gen 2 is the better device. The software is in a different league, outdoor performance is stronger, and the long-term flexibility is hard to beat at this price point.

If you have the space indoors, and you want the flexibility of a device for the range, I still love the Mevo Gen 2

But the Square Omni earned its hype. If your primary use is GSPro and you want accurate data without paying a subscription for that access, the Omni makes a serious case for itself at $1,600.

This is also the pick for those of you who have smaller spaces at home, and can’t fit a Doppler radar setup.

Keep reading, and I’ll explain exactly where each one wins and loses.

What Each One Is

FlightScope Mevo Gen 2: The Professional-Level Choice

The Mevo Gen 2 is the official successor to the Mevo Plus, which spent four years as my top overall pick for portable launch monitors. The Gen 2 does everything the Plus did, but with a better battery (6 hours versus the Plus’s 2.5), a slightly larger radar for better indoor tracking, and USB-C instead of the old mini-USB. Meaningful upgrades all around.

The real story is the software. FlightScope’s FS Golf app is the same platform running their $15,000 X3c. That’s not marketing. You genuinely get professional-level data customization, a real-time shot tracer, Apple Watch integration, and compatibility with virtually every third-party sim platform out there (GSPro, Awesome Golf, Golf Club 2019, and more), all with no subscription fee.

At $1,299 retail (or $1,234 with Flightscope discount code BREAKINGEIGHTYPLUS), you’re buying ball data to start. But you have the option to add the Pro Package later for $599 (retail $1,000), which unlocks full club data including face-to-path, dynamic loft, swing plane, and impact location. Face Impact Location is another $299. Or you can bundle both for $850 after the code. Total all-in should be around $2,041. MSRP is more, but this is the price you should be able to find it at 80% of the time.

That flexibility is one of the most underrated things about this device. You don’t have to commit to the full package up front.

Square Omni: The Optical Contender

The Square Omni is a four-camera optical launch monitor at $1,600. No subscription. Works indoors and outdoors, which is already an upgrade from the original Square (indoor only). The build is a significant step up too: the whole thing is aluminum, and it feels like it.

Setup is remarkably simple. Download the app, find the device over Bluetooth, connect. Seconds. You set a plastic tripod on the device, put it in front of you, and start hitting.

The headline, and it genuinely surprised me: the accuracy. Three indoor sessions against a Trackman, and on wedges through long irons, ball speed was nearly identical 90% of the time. Spin was usually within 100 to 300 RPM on well-struck shots. One example: a carry of 181.1 on the Omni against the Trackman’s 180.6, ball speed 119.3 against 119.5, spin 3,465 against 3,597. Against a Trackman, indoors, that’s impressive.

Club data is included via stickers. Two per club: one on the face, one near the hosel. The face sticker gets you impact detection. The hosel sticker unlocks club path, face to target, angle of attack, and dynamic loft. Good data. Gets a little cumbersome to apply across a full bag.

How They Stack Up Head to Head

Technology: Two Different Methods

The Mevo Gen 2 uses Doppler radar. It physically tracks the ball in flight, which is why it tends to be more reliable outdoors and in varied lighting. The same Fusion Tracking engine inside the $15K X3c is running the Gen 2.

The Square Omni uses four cameras. Optical units have historically excelled indoors (no ambient light interference, no ball-tracking challenges) and on short shots like chips and putts. The Omni delivers on both of those. The putting results in sim mode surprised me. Short chips were good too, which is an area where a lot of launch monitors struggle.

Doppler has an inherent outdoor advantage because it tracks the ball rather than capturing it optically. That edge shows with the Gen 2. But the Omni performed better outdoors than I expected from a camera unit (with the exception of the built-in screen, which is tough to see.  But hey, the Mevo doesn’t even have a screen, so….)

Setup

Square Omni wins this one, and it isn’t close.

Bluetooth, connect, hit. The app dropped the connection once across hours of testing. That’s it.

The Mevo Gen 2 requires more work. You need the unit dialed in to roughly 12 degrees tilt and 0 degrees roll before you start. The FS Golf app shows you exactly where you stand in real time, which is helpful. The problem is the stand design: two positions (open or closed), which means on uneven ground, getting alignment right takes some finagling. I give the Gen 2 a solid B on setup. Not a dealbreaker, but definitely a difference.

FlightScope did fix the connectivity problem that used to frustrate Mevo Plus users. You can now share your network while connected to the Gen 2, so an iPad can be on the internet and the launch monitor at the same time. Good improvement.

Accuracy

Both are accurate. More accurate than I expected from either at their respective price points.

The Mevo Gen 2, tested against a Trackman indoors, had roughly 7 out of 10 shots within 1 to 2 yards, with spin within 200 RPM. The other 2 to 3 shots showed more variance: up to 5 to 7 yards off with driver, spin occasionally up to 3,000 RPM different.

The Omni was even tighter on irons and wedges across three indoor Trackman sessions. Driver had slightly more variance. But on short irons and mid-irons especially, I was genuinely impressed at how close it came in.

I’d call this close to a wash, with the Omni edging the Gen 2 on indoor iron accuracy and the Gen 2 holding its advantage outdoors. Either one gives you numbers you can trust.

Software and App Experience

This is where the Mevo Gen 2 separates itself. 

The level of data customization in the FS golf app is remarkable: view your numbers any way you want, set data margins, pull up a real-time shot tracer, configure multi-camera setups, connect to an Apple Watch for data on your wrist after every shot. I’m not sure why more launch monitor brands don’t do the Apple Watch thing, but FlightScope has it, and it’s excellent.

Does the app feel slightly dated in some spots? Yeah, a little. But the substance is there, and on the stuff that matters, it’s among the best app experiences at this price.

The Square app works. Getting set up is easy. The range mode is fine. But it’s bare bones. Very little customization, and even after plenty of use, I found myself hunting for where a specific stat was displayed. You can’t choose which numbers to show or where.

The on-device screen on the Omni is, honestly, my least favorite screen of any launch monitor I’ve tested. It reads like a blob of numbers. Hard to scan, no customization, and in bright sun it’s nearly useless as a status indicator. But, it is better than nothing.

If software matters to you, the Gen 2 wins this category going away.

No Subscription (Both Get This Right)

Both devices deserve credit here. In a world where every piece of golf tech seems to come with a monthly fee, it’s worth acknowledging when brands get this right.

The Mevo Gen 2 charges nothing beyond the device price. Pro Package and Face Impact Location are one-time unlocks. Third-party software compatibility (GSPro, Awesome Golf, others) is included with no subscription. That last part matters more than it sounds: most other launch monitor companies charge $99 to $499 a year just for the ability to connect to third-party software.

Square uses a credits model for native sim play. The Omni comes with 1,000 credits. Every hole of simulated golf costs one credit per player, so 18 holes costs 18 credits. Another 1,000 credits is about $20. That’s 1,000 holes for 20 bucks. For most people, that’ll last a year or more. Range practice costs nothing.

I like this model. You only pay for what you use.

GSPro Integration

This is where the Omni makes its most compelling case.

If GSPro is your primary use case, the Square Omni is probably my recommendation. No extra charge to Square for connecting to GSPro. You pay the $250-per-year GSPro fee, and that’s your only ongoing cost.

The Mevo Gen 2 is also compatible with GSPro and also charges nothing extra for third-party access. So on the access question, they’re tied. The only reason the Omni is better here for some people simply comes down to space. A lot of people at home don’t have the 16 feet of space (8 feet in front, and 8 feet behind the unit to get the most accurate results out of the FlightScope.

But if you do? Consider this a wash as well, as both are among the only brands that don’t charge extra to charge for direct GSPro integration.

To use the Bushnell Launch Pro with GSPro, you need the Gold subscription at $500 a year on top of the $250 to GSPro: $750 annually. With the Omni or FlightScope, that’s $250. And between those devices, accuracy is very similar.

Outdoor Experience

Mevo Gen 2 has an edge here.

Doppler radar tracking the ball in flight is inherently more reliable outdoors than four cameras reading stickers. Despite not having a built in screen, the display and outdoor use of these units feels similar. 

I don’t love using the Omni on it’s own because I think the screen is too difficult to read. I’d go with the Launch Pro if this was important in this price range.

So for me, I’m using an iPad or phone with either the Mevo Gen 2 or the Omni. But where the Mevo Gen 2 has an edge is with Apple Watch integration.

The Omni works outdoors and the accuracy was solid in my testing. But the screen experience in bright sun is frustrating. The green “ready” bar is hard to see. The solid red indicator lights that signal the device is ready are positioned low on the unit, which means you’re crouching down to check before every shot. That got old fast. Most of it goes away on a cloudy day or under cover. 

Portability

One thing worth noting: the Mevo Gen 2 comes with a high-quality canvas case that fits in most standard golf bags. The Square Omni, at $1,600, comes with no carrying case. 

The case is a small thing, but it does make a difference if you plan to use both indoors and out. Mevo Gen 2 wins here.

Long-Term Support

FlightScope has decades of experience behind it. Features that started on their higher-end units (Fusion technology, the environmental optimizer) have consistently trickled down to the Mevo line. When you buy a Gen 2, you’re buying into a proven support track record and a company that will keep improving the software.

Square Golf is notoriously hard to reach. I’ve personally never been able to get anyone on the phone from that company. The original Square community flagged this over and over. And there’s a legitimate question about whether the app will continue improving or whether they’ll pull a move similar to what Voice Caddie did with the SC4: roll out an essentially identical new unit and lock the updates to that new hardware.

Do I think Square will do that? Not necessarily. But it’s a real concern next to a company like FlightScope with a proven track record. If you’re buying the Omni, buy it through PlayBetter. Returns are easier, and you’ll have someone to call if something goes wrong.

What I Don’t Love About Each

FlightScope Mevo Gen 2:

• The stand design. Two positions (open or closed), which makes outdoor alignment on uneven ground genuinely annoying. The Mevo Plus had a more adjustable stand, and I miss it.
• Every 5 or 6 shots in testing, the device would occasionally drop from “Ready” to “Connected” in the app. A quick tap fixed it. Minor, likely patchable, but still noticeable during a session.
• The carrying case is bigger than necessary because it accommodates the external charger. Small gripe, but the Mevo Plus case was more compact.
• The e6 bundle includes 8 courses. The Mevo Plus got 12, including Pebble Beach and St Andrews. A small step back.

Square Omni:

• The on-device screen is my least favorite of any launch monitor I’ve tested. Reads like a blob of numbers in good conditions. In bright sun, it’s almost useless as a status indicator.
• No carrying case at $1,600. For a device that goes back and forth between indoor and outdoor use, this is a real oversight.
• Club data requires two stickers per club: one on the face, one near the hosel. Gets cumbersome across a full bag.
• The native sim courses aren’t recognizable tracks. Not sure if they’re real courses somewhere or fictional. Either way, they don’t do much for me. GSPro is where you want to be playing courses.
• Customer support is basically nonexistent. That’s a genuine concern if something breaks or you have a warranty issue.
• Software update trajectory is a question mark. The app needs to improve to keep pace with the hardware, and there’s no certainty that it will.

So Which One Should You Buy?

Buy the FlightScope Mevo Gen 2 if:

• You want the best software experience at this price point. The FS Golf app is genuinely pro-level, and that’s what you interact with every single session.
• You plan to use your launch monitor outdoors as much as indoors. Doppler is more reliable outside, and the display experience (Apple Watch, iPad) is far more comfortable in the sun.
• You want the flexibility to grow into more data over time. Start with ball data, add Pro Package when you’re ready. No subscription at any stage.
• Long-term support and a proven company track record matter to you.
• You want a device that FlightScope will be actively developing for years. The Gen 2 is where their attention is going.

Buy the Square Omni if:

• GSPro is your primary use case. The Omni gives you excellent accuracy into GSPro with no subscription beyond the GSPro fee itself. That’s a hard value proposition to beat.
• You want club data included at this price without buying an upgrade. The Omni includes impact detection and club data capability at $1,600. On the Gen 2, you’d need to add the Pro Package to match it, which puts you at around $1,803 after the code.
• Your use is primarily indoor. The Omni was built around indoor performance, and the accuracy shows it.
• Easy setup is important to you. The Bluetooth pairing is about as simple as launch monitor setup gets.
• You’re on a budget and accuracy is your top priority. At $1,600, this is one of the most accurate launch monitors I’ve tested at any price.

My Final Take

For most golfers, I’d get the Mevo Gen 2.

The software difference is real, the outdoor experience is significantly better, and the long-term support from FlightScope is worth something. Use code BREAKINGEIGHTYPLUS and you’re at $1,234. If you’re serious about getting into the data, add the Pro Package and Impact Detection and you’ve got the full experience for just over $2k all in. That’s an excellent deal for what you’re getting.

But the Square Omni earned its hype. The accuracy surprised me, the GSPro integration is excellent for the money, and for a golfer whose primary use is sim play, it’s one of the best values at this price point right now. Just buy it through PlayBetter so you’ve got some customer service recourse if you need it.

Either way, you’re getting a capable device. These two just serve different golfers.

Neither of these feel like the right fit? Check out my full list of the best golf launch monitors.